Skip to content

Pavement to Parks

September 25, 2009

Gene Miller sent along a well-illustrated article from the New York Times on the Pavement to Parks movement, with some good examples that we’ve featured in Price Tags. 

What jumped out at me was a project I had not heard of before – LentSpace, a temporary installation in Manhattan’s SoHo. 

Just look at the deal brokered for the recently inaugurated LentSpace on Canal, Varick, Grand and Sullivan Streets in Soho. It’s a model for citywide land use in New York and, indeed, any city or town cursed with empty lots; the Lower Manhattan Cultural Council has created an “in the meantime” activity for a vacant site awaiting future development.

 lentspace_480

In the case of LentSpace, the developer, Trinity Real Estate, is providing a three-year lease — and receives a write-off in return. (One hopes Trinity will eventually give in to LentSpace’s request to remove the chain-link fence that still surrounds the space.)

Sounds somewhat like the community gardens that have popped up on development sites in downtown Vancouver, along with the criticism that the developers are doing this not out of altruism but for the short-term tax advantage.  Or that it will lead to conflict when the ‘public’ space is reprivatized.

Some will continue to argue that no, Trinity and others will never get their land back, that this is too complicated, too risky. I’ll argue that the alternative — to let us all live oblivious to the blight that surrounds us — isn’t a viable one. … I love the fact that this is entering into the global conversation for many reasons, not least that it acknowledges the importance of small yet impactful gestures in our daily lives, like the recent spate of public spaces, created on the cheap, and full of heart.

Advertisement
2 Comments leave one →
  1. October 13, 2009 5:58 am

    Personally, I love how a community can transform vacant sites awaiting development into something beautiful.

    But having watched the battle over the “Salsbury Garden” a few years ago, I would also understand the reluctance of both property owners and the city to encourage such activity. Once a space becomes part of the community, it can be hard to “take it back” as the property owner to proceed with your building plans.

Trackbacks

  1. re:place Magazine

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 72 other followers